Political figures Want to Protect us From the Evils of On-Line Gambling.
This really is part 1 of a multipart series of articles regarding proposed anti-gambling legislation. In this informative article I discuss the proposed legislation, what the politicians say it will, some facts about the current state of online gambling, and what the bills really propose.
The legislators are attempting to protect us from something, or are they? The whole lot seems only a little confusing to express the least.
The House, and the Senate, are once more considering the issue of “Online Gambling” ;.Bills have been submitted by Congressmen Goodlatte and Leach, and also by Senator Kyl.
The bill being put forward by Rep. Goodlatte gets the stated intention of updating the Wire Act to outlaw all kinds of online gambling, to produce it illegal for a gambling business to just accept credit and electronic transfers, and to force ISPs and Common Carriers to block use of gambling related sites at the request of law enforcement.
In the same way does Rep. Goodlatte, Sen. Kyl, in his bill, Prohibition on Funding of Unlawful Internet Gambling, makes it illegal for gambling businesses to just accept credit cards, electronic transfers, checks and other forms of payment, but his bill doesn’t address the keeping bets.
The bill submitted by Rep. Leach, The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act, is actually a copy of the bill submitted by Sen. Kyl. It centers around preventing gambling businesses from accepting credit cards, electronic transfers, checks, and other payments, and like the Kyl bill makes no changes to what is legal.
Based on Rep. Goodlatte “While gambling is illegal in the United States unless regulated by the states, the development of the Internet has made gambling easily accessible. It is common for illegal gambling businesses to use freely until law enforcement finds and stops them.”
In reality, American courts have determined that the Wire Act makes only Sports Betting illegal, and even then only across telephone lines. Not many states have laws which make online gambling illegal, some states and Tribes have taken steps to legalize online gambling, and even the Federal government recognizes some kinds of online gambling as being legal.메이저사이트
Goodlatte himself says his bill “cracks down on illegal gambling by updating the Wire Act to cover all kinds of interstate gambling and take into account new technologies. Under current federal law, it is unclear whether utilising the Internet to use a gambling business is illegal” ;.
Goodlatte’s bill however doesn’t “cover all kinds of interstate gambling” as he claims, but instead carves out exemptions for a number of kinds of online gambling such as for example state lotteries, bets on horse racing, and fantasy sports. Even then, his modifications to the Wire Act don’t make online gambling illegal, they allow it to be illegal for a gambling business to just accept online bets in which a person risks something of value “upon the outcome of a contest of others, a sporting event, or even a game predominantly susceptible to chance”, except of course if it is a state lottery, horse race, fantasy sports, or one of a few other situations.
The facts of the matter is that many online gambling businesses have positioned in other countries specifically to avoid the gray area that is the current state of online gambling in the US. As a result, there’s little that law enforcement can perform to enforce these laws. Trying to make the laws tougher, and providing for stiffer penalties, won’t make them simpler to enforce.
As well, most, if not totally all, banks and charge card companies won’t transfer money to an on the web gambling business now, as a result of pressure from the federal government. As a result, alternative payment systems sprang up to fill the void.
Senator Kyl is equally misleading in his statements. From his proposed bill, “Internet gambling is primarily funded through personal usage of payment system instruments, credit cards, and wire transfers.” But once we know, most credit cards in the U.S. refuse attempts to fund a gambling account.
Also from the Kyl bill, “Internet gambling is a growing reason behind debt collection problems for insured depository institutions and the buyer credit industry.” If the charge card companies and other financial institutions in the U.S aren’t allowing the funding of gambling, how would it be “a growing reason behind debt collection problems” ;.And since when do we want legislation to ensure that the financial industry to protect itself from high risk debt. If the financial industry was accepting gambling debts and these gambling charges were an issue for them, wouldn’t they only stop accepting them?